cloak: (thought)
山姥切国広 ([personal profile] cloak) wrote in [community profile] thefarshore2016-07-31 12:04 am

HEAVEN'S BBS | TEXT

Posted: April 10th, 1:45 AM
From: Roxas

Our current system could use improvements.

For that reason, I'm looking into two prospective methods:
— An ayakashi detection network
— An emergency contact system

I think it's worthwhile to see if those with mechanical and programming skill could create a network of monitoring devices that specifically respond to an ayakashi's darkness. This would enable us to detect them sooner and dispatch them more efficiently.

And this system would be used in conjunction with an automatic forwarding system. A message concerning detected ayakashi and location(s) would be sent out to any volunteers on a mailing list.

In addition to this, the emergency contact system could be used by gods or shinki to notify others when they're in need of assistance. Anyone who volunteers to be respondents on that system will have messages automatically forwarded to them, so they can assist in handling threats.

If anyone is interested in making this work, respond with relevant skills and what aspect you want to participate in. In my case, I can Hold the Fort but I can't Kill Ayakashi. I have knowledge of Coding, but not Mechanics.


[ooc: In response to a whole mess that resulted in needing to name a shinki to save him from being consumed and the blightstorm that followed, he's of the impression that certain provisions should be made to avoid the necessity of such last-ditch options.

Also! Please feel free to thread hop/jack! By all means coordinate efforts with folks of similar skills/abilities or heckle each other. Hoping this gives people something to play with]
revolutionfalcon: (dramatic wind)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-19 05:14 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't sound like they're planning to be the ones to do it. If it goes on much longer, we'll have to take things into our own hands. At least, we need to make them understand they can't keep acting like this and expect not to be held accountable.
revolutionfalcon: (say that again fusion scum--)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-20 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not planning to start some full-scale revolution through here, if that's what you're worried about. But some open dissent might help them see what they're doing is creating enemies within their own ranks.

And if they come after me for it, then we'll know their true colours, one way or another.


[If they did respond that way, it wouldn't be his own life he'd be afraid for.]
revolutionfalcon: (still standing)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-22 09:49 am (UTC)(link)
I'll keep my eye out for them, then. Have any of us made any significant moves before this?

If they're not going to run it properly, then we don't have much choice but to make them care. It's only a matter of time before they screw something up again, and if it keeps happening, people aren't just going to lie down and take it.
revolutionfalcon: (dominant)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-24 10:03 am (UTC)(link)
So the answer was that easy, but she didn't say as much from the start? That's stretching even incompetence to unbelievable levels, it might as well have been malicious.

Exactly. For people who are supposed to be offering protection, if they're this bad at it, you have to wonder how the hell they're supposed to be managing all the people outside of this place.
revolutionfalcon: (200% done and rising)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-25 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Right. Unprecedented doesn't mean it should never have been considered in the first place, and information that easy to provide doesn't give a good excuse as to why it wasn't.

It's that making me doubt it was entirely an accident. They must have been doing this for far longer than we've been here, making that kind of mistake shouldn't be happening at all anymore.
revolutionfalcon: (explanation)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-26 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
That kind of "reassurance" isn't reassuring at all. It just makes it sound like they were trying to cover something up within their ranks. That's another possibility - some of them having malicious intent, but not all.

If anything like this happens again, all of us need to keep a better eye out. Especially if it was sabotage, because that makes it far more likely that it might.
revolutionfalcon: (derisive)

[personal profile] revolutionfalcon 2016-08-27 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
That just makes it smell even more like a cover-up. Something like that, you'd think they'd make an example.

It's something, even if it's too little and too late for what happened then.