Doctor Julian Bashir (
asklepian) wrote in
thefarshore2017-01-29 09:06 pm
(no subject)
Posted: June 8th
From: Asclepius
Something I've found myself quite interested in over the last few weeks has been a question of...well, I suppose our existence.
Pardon me if this question has been asked before, I haven't seen it. I'd appreciate a summary of that particular conversation, if it has happened before.
Now, as a bit of background--I am from...a fairly significant amount of time in the future. I state that vaguely because there are rules against discussing it, we accidentally time travel often enough that there's protocol in place. But I feel fairly confident after my research that I am also in what I would consider a parallel universe. Those are also fairly well-documented in my time. (I must say this is far more pleasant than the last one I was in.)
Anyway. If all that is the case, I have to wonder: why do the divisions of god and shinki fall as they do? Whatever power brought us here evidently can reach through time and both physical and metaphorical space. Infinite realities mean infinite possibilities that in one or the other reality, we are either alive or dead.
Please keep all specific instances and examples private if you wish to give them. I don't want this discussion to be the cause of harm to anyone.
From: Asclepius
Something I've found myself quite interested in over the last few weeks has been a question of...well, I suppose our existence.
Pardon me if this question has been asked before, I haven't seen it. I'd appreciate a summary of that particular conversation, if it has happened before.
Now, as a bit of background--I am from...a fairly significant amount of time in the future. I state that vaguely because there are rules against discussing it, we accidentally time travel often enough that there's protocol in place. But I feel fairly confident after my research that I am also in what I would consider a parallel universe. Those are also fairly well-documented in my time. (I must say this is far more pleasant than the last one I was in.)
Anyway. If all that is the case, I have to wonder: why do the divisions of god and shinki fall as they do? Whatever power brought us here evidently can reach through time and both physical and metaphorical space. Infinite realities mean infinite possibilities that in one or the other reality, we are either alive or dead.
Please keep all specific instances and examples private if you wish to give them. I don't want this discussion to be the cause of harm to anyone.

no subject
Ask why water is wet, Zeno can actually think of a reason or two for that.
no subject
[Amuse him.]
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
For some of us, we don't just show up here once. I've been told that I was here as a shinki for awhile before I disappeared. I don't remember anything about that time. And now I'm a god.
Try explaining that.
no subject
Well, there are a few potential reasons for that. Nothing that can be said with much certainty of course.
First, obviously there's the possibility of your being drawn from earlier in your timeline, therefore whatever brought you here as a shinki hasn't happened yet.
Then, there's the possibility of you not being from the same reality. An alternate one just a step to the left, for instance. So you don't recall because it wasn't truly you the last time you were here, but a counterpart from one of the infinite number of parallel realities.
Third, and I don't like this one very much at all, whatever power brings us here has the ability to manipulate the memories of gods as well.
no subject
[Especially since the things he's heard about the other Riku don't exactly make him like the guy.]
So you're saying that even us gods could be dead but had our memories altered like the shinki?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
[Of course, his answer would have been different if he remembered his previous life had been drastically changed by one time travel mishap.]
no subject
Of course both times put me well ahead of the current year, but quite a few of the important historical events I know of don't seem to have happened in this reality anyway.
no subject
if you can't prove it, then show me the research about parallel universes that you mentioned before.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
Though, I take it you wouldn't simply be satisfied if I told you that the Heavens has the power to do all of these things you speak of.
Re: text;
Though I have to admit, I've never been a man of faith.
Either way, I at least find it an interesting topic of discussion.
Re: text;
It certainly is. Though, if this place is simply a parallel world, wouldn't you have been able to find a way to leave in that case?
text
text
Re: text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
Re: text
Re: text
Re: text
Re: text
Re: text
Re: text
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
When you say 'future' you mean relative to this particular world, yes?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
from: Dana Scully
In any case, if we're accepting time travel as a possibility, you don't need alternate realities to find one in which we're dead. You just have to pick an appropriate point on our individual timeline.
no subject
Also fair, but there's the fact that the history I was taught in school from 1950 to now simply is not recorded in any book I have been able to find, and the world is not divided at all in the same ways.
no subject
I don't remember anything from before arriving here, so I'm not going to be able to offer you any hints about why they picked me or how close this is to where I'm from. I'm not familiar with some of the technology.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
<Ixtlilton>
[Simon certainly sat up and paid attention at the mention of Asclepius being 'from the future'...but the rest makes it clear that it isn't his future.
He isn't sure if he's relieved about that or just lonely.]
no subject
It certainly complicates things. And all of this is mostly wild speculation anyway. All I can draw upon is the history I learned in school. I happen to hold a particular interest in the hundred years between 1950 and 2050, which we happen to be right in the middle of.
no subject
History which may no longer fully apply. I can understand why you wouldn't want to share the specifics of what your history books contain, I wouldn't either rules or no. Though I confess I'm curious how much of what you were taught differs from my own lessons.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Anon; text
Re: Anon; text
Re: Anon; text
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
from: carl adler
no subject
Someone else that responded said that they'd been here before, but as a shinki instead of a god, and did not remember it.
So, that complicates things.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)