oathkeeper: <user name=tasteofblame site=livejournal.com> (☾35)
PRESS ▲ TO SORA ([personal profile] oathkeeper) wrote in [community profile] thefarshore2016-07-13 08:09 am

HEAVEN'S BBS | TEXT 002

Posted: 04 Apr 2016 3:22pm
From: sora

hi it’s sora, working name baldr!

question. are ayakashi supposed to be able to get close to our temples? mega close nearly inside almost smashing stuff up, close?

i don’t think that’s normal-- but if it is i need to find away to protect my temple so it doesn’t happen again! it’s a real royal pain in my butt and not safe for my shinki either if i’m not there and it happens again! does anyone have any good ideas?

does my temple being on the shore have anything to do with it? bleh.
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0043)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-21 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
But you still insist on going personally.

And I did—the scenario I gave says that you're incapable of saving both, so even if you did bring someone it would be impossible. You have to choose.

You're an AI, aren't you? If you're capable of maintaining multiple priorities of exact equal importance, that's just poor programming. Something must be of a slightly higher priority. Are you trying not to hurt my feelings? It's alright if you'd prefer to save Sora. I'd rather know these things in advance so I can be prepared for it, keeping it to yourself doesn't help anyone.
cloak: (thought)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-21 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course I do. I won't call someone and sit back to do nothing.

Based on what you said, it's only specified that I personally could not save both. That doesn't rule out other parties.

You already have my answer, Add. I'm responsible for you and Ludger, that's part and parcel of my purpose. Sora's capabilities are comparable to my own, and he's overcome anything he's been faced with before, without me.

That just doesn't mean I wouldn't try to help where I can.
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0011)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-25 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Fine, then I'll clarify. In this hypothetical scenario you are unable to save both targets, and cannot rely on others to save the one you don't pick. Whoever you choose is guaranteed safety and survival, while the other is left to certain death, regardless of their own capabilities. The choice is yours to make.

In that situation, you would still save your own shinki over someone of great personal importance to yourself. Is that correct?
cloak: (thought)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-26 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
The parameters you set are flawed.

You're suggesting none of my shinki are of great personal importance to myself.


[Which...is as close as he can probably get to hedging into this topic. Sorry Add he can't tell you that it be you.

RIP]
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0098)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-26 08:11 am (UTC)(link)
You know what I'm asking, you're just dodging the question again.

In that case, I'll interpret your answer as picking your shinki first and foremost. It's an answer I would've expected from you anyway, considering you're supposed to be an AI. Your role here is to protect your shinki along with answering this world's prayers. Personal attachments, whether you're capable of them or not, should come after responsibilities.

So keep that in mind before you go throwing yourself into danger.
cloak: (say)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-26 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Anything else you'd like to lecture me on, while we're at it?
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0126)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-27 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
Don't sass me for trying to put things into perspective for you!

Isn't it a shinki's job to advise their god? So shut up and listen to what I'm telling you.
[that would only be if Add was his exemplar (HAHAHA), but close enough, right...]
cloak: (thought)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-27 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
I think you're supposed to be my "moral compass".

[Does that really sound like the job for you, Add?]
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0008)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-27 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly, so you should be listening to my evaluations. I'm glad we've come to an agreement on that.
cloak: (thought)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-27 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
You don't have to worry so much, Add.

I may not be human, but there are things I understand.
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0087)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-27 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
I'm only telling you this because your idiotic choices affect me.

And what the hell is that even supposed to mean?
[???? understand WHAT]
cloak: (Default)

[personal profile] cloak 2016-07-27 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
I don't forget anything. Just remember that.

[Which is his very cryptic way of giving Add a hint.

Too cryptic, surely, but...he still says it]
subtract: you lose your mind (I-0125)

[personal profile] subtract 2016-07-27 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
[Way too cryptic, but okay, sure. He'll just take that as Roxas saying he'll keep Add's advice in mind...

Success?]